Enforcing right to work proposed as a way to create jobs
By Juhani Artto
A few years ago the labour researcher Kimmo Kevštsalo -- who works for the Finnish Metalworkers Union -- proposed an hours of work model for industrialised countries which would eliminate unemployment. He recently repeated this proposal after learning of a similar model proposed by Dr. Patrick M. Liedtke, a member of the Club of Rome working group.
The basis of Kevštsalo's model is a 20-hour working week. Employers would be obliged to offer work to all citizens of working age so that nobody would be forced to remain unemployed.
"The pay for this weekly 20 hours of work, which would be mandatory for both employers and employees, could be set at the average level of present unemployment compensation (or the minimum income level)", Kevštsalo writes in his column in the Metalworkers Union publication Ahjo (6-98).
"Any remaining work would be performed flexibly either by employees or by
entrepreneurs of various kinds. A few people would not exceed the 20-hour norm, earning only the minimum wage, while others would perform a weekly 40-60 hours of demanding skilled work earning as much as high income workers under current conditions.
"The constitutional right to work would become a reality and labour market flexibility would significantly increase."
In an interview conducted by Matti Arvaja and published on 29 March 1998 in the South-West Finland daily newspaper Turun Sanomat, Kevštsalo adds further ideas and details to the model, emphasising that a general reduction in working hours is not the objective.
"Implementation of my proposal would most likely lead to longer working hours. Only the working hour norm would be halved."
As his motive for developing the model Kevštsalo, refers to high unemployment and the need of enterprises for a more flexible workforce. In Kevštsalo's opinion, future hours of work cannot be based on a fixed working week of 37.5 hours. For those working only 20 hours per week, hours of work could be evened out to achieve the norm within a year.
The rate of pay for work beyond the weekly 20 hours would be determined freely by the labour market. This, Kevštsalo believes, would be welcomed by higher salaried employees who nowadays usually enjoy no limitations governing the extra hours which they have to work without overtime compensation.
Kevštsalo has no illusions about probable immediate reactions to his proposal. "I know that the idea is far too radical to lead to any substantial concrete measures for quite a long time", he writes in Ahjo.
The source of this article: Trade Union News from Finland
- The decline of the 'employment society' (January 1999)
- Citizen's Income stirs debate (September 1998)
- The end of work or the end of wage slavery? (June 1998)
- Citizen's Income model
- 6+6 hour model
- A social welfare state which encourages job creation
Archbishop of Finland supports Citizens Income